Trace operators and theta series for \(\Gamma_{0,n} [q]\) and \(\Gamma_n[q]\) (Q1434512): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claim: author (P16): Item:Q931904
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: Francesco Ludovico Chiera / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00209-003-0556-5 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2030107370 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 00:15, 20 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Trace operators and theta series for \(\Gamma_{0,n} [q]\) and \(\Gamma_n[q]\)
scientific article

    Statements

    Trace operators and theta series for \(\Gamma_{0,n} [q]\) and \(\Gamma_n[q]\) (English)
    0 references
    7 July 2004
    0 references
    Consider a pair \(\Gamma\subset\Gamma'\) of congruence subgroups of \(Sp(n,\mathbb{Z})\) with multiplier systems \(v\) on \(\Gamma\), \(v'\) on \(\Gamma'\) such that \(v'| \Gamma =v\). Let \([\Gamma,\rho,v]\) denote the space of Siegel modular forms for a suitable representation \(\rho\) of GL\(_n(\mathbb{C})\) and with multiplier \(v\), and let \(\Theta [\Gamma]_\rho\) denote the subspace of \([\Gamma,\rho,v]\) spanned by the theta series contained in that space. The author is concerned with the general problem as to when \[ \Theta[\Gamma]_\rho\cap[\Gamma',\rho,v'] =\Theta[\Gamma']_\rho. \] First this general question is translated into different terms by introducing the trace operator from \([\Gamma,\rho,v]\) to \([\Gamma',\rho,v']\) which is simply the symmetrization map with respect to the cosets of \(\Gamma\setminus\Gamma'\). Then the author considers the special case \(\Gamma=\Gamma_n[q]\) (principal subgroups of level \(q)\), \(\Gamma'=\Gamma_{0,n}[q]\) (Hecke subgroup). In this case he succeeds in expressing the image of a theta series in \(\theta [\Gamma_n [q]]_\rho\) under the trace operator in terms of theta series in \(\theta [\Gamma_{0,n}[q]]_\rho\). Under mild technical conditions this gives an affirmative answer to the problem in the special case under consideration. The idea of proof is to reduce the problem to the singular case. The key point is a commutation formula for the trace operator and the Siegel \(\Phi\)-operator.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Siegel modular form
    0 references
    Theta series
    0 references
    trace operator
    0 references
    0 references