An analogy of the theorem of Hector and Duminy (Q1190713): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.14492/hokmj/1381413260 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2083254919 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 01:13, 20 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | An analogy of the theorem of Hector and Duminy |
scientific article |
Statements
An analogy of the theorem of Hector and Duminy (English)
0 references
26 September 1992
0 references
An unpublished theorem of G. Duminy asserts that, in a \(C^ 2\) foliation \(\mathcal F\) of codimension one on a closed manifold \(M\), a semiproper, exceptional leaf will have a holonomy contraction on its nonproper side. This leads to the striking result that a semiproper leaf in an exceptional minimal set has a Cantor set of ends. These results have been cited by various authors and were to have appeared in Duminy's thesis, under the direction of G. Hector, in the late 1970's. Unfortunately, this was never written. (The reviewer and J. Cantwell have written up a proof and circulated it informally.) In the paper under review, the author presents an analogous result in higher codimension. Not surprisingly, very restrictive hypotheses are required on the holonomy pseudogroup \(\Gamma\) and on the orbit \(\Gamma(x_ 0)\) which corresponds to the leaf in question. Roughly speaking, the pseudogroup is required to consist of similarity transformations and the ``exceptional and semiproper'' hypothesis on \(\Gamma(x_ 0)\), which makes no sense in higher codimension, is replaced by a hypothesis that ``\(\Gamma(x_ 0)\) is nonproper and with bubbles''. The conclusion is that there is a nontrivial element \(g\in \Gamma\) with \(g(x_ 0)=x_ 0\). This is a weaker analogy than would be hoped for, since it allows the possibility that \(g\) is a pure rotation. The author does not know if there is an example in which all holonomy elements fixing \(x_ 0\) are pure rotations.
0 references
semiproper leaf in an exceptional minimal set
0 references
holonomy pseudogroup
0 references
similarity transformations
0 references
nonproper
0 references
bubbles
0 references