Levitin-Polyak well-posedness of generalized vector quasi-equilibrium problems (Q2379813): Difference between revisions

Considered are two classes of generalized vector quasi-equilibrium problem of finding an \(x^0\in E\) such that \[ x^0\in K(x^0) \quad \text{and}\quad F(x^0,y)\not\subset -\operatorname{int}C (x^0),\quad \forall y\in K(x^0), \] and of finding an \(x^1\in E\) such that \[ x^1\in K(x^1) \quad \text{and}\quad F(x^1,y)\subset -C(x^1),\quad \forall y\in K(x^1). \] where \((X,d) \) is a metric space, \(Z\) is a locally convex Haussdorff topological space, \(E\) is a nonempty closed and convex subset in \( X,C:E\rightrightarrows Z\) is a set-valued mapping such that for any \(x\in E\), \(C(x)\) is a proper, pointed, closed and convex cone in \(Z\) with nonempty interior \(\operatorname{int}C(x)\), \(K:E\rightrightarrows E\) and \( F:E\times E\rightrightarrows Z\) are two nontrivial (i.e., their images are nonempty for all \(x\in E\)) set-valued maps. The authors introduce the definitions of the Levitin-Polyak well-posedness for these problems and their criteria and characterizations are investigated. Some equivalent relations between the Levitin-Polyak well-posedness for optimization problems and the Levitin-Polyak well-posedness for generalized vector quasi-equilibrium problems are obtained. Finally, the authors derive a set-valued version of Ekeland's variational principle and apply it to establish a sufficient condition for the Levitin-Polyak well-posedness of a class of generalized vector quasi-equilibrium problems.