Analysis of a class of frictional contact problems for the Bingham fluid (Q2504842): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Sanda Cleja-Ţigoiu / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Sanda Cleja-Ţigoiu / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00009-005-0033-y / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1974710969 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 00:28, 20 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Analysis of a class of frictional contact problems for the Bingham fluid
scientific article

    Statements

    Analysis of a class of frictional contact problems for the Bingham fluid (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    28 September 2006
    0 references
    The paper is devoted to Bingham fluid problems, when a subdifferential boundary condition is imposed on a part of the boundary, in order to describe the frictional contact. The formulated quasi--static problem leads to a variational inequality. In order to prove the existence theorems, the results already existing in the literature have been reconsidered, under the hypothesis that the functional \(d\), which characterizes the frictional contact, is convex, proper and lower semicontinuous, on a given linear subspace \(U\). The main contribution of the paper ought to be the examples to justify the proposed framework. In the analysed example from the literature, 5.1 and 5.2, the normal speed is zero on the frictional contact boundary. In the examples 5.3, 5.4 and 5.6 listed in the paper, the normal speed is non-zero and consequently the statement \textit{Similar arguments as those used above can be employed \dots in the study of the following examples}, i.e. 5.3, 5.4 and 5.6, is misleading. The linear space \(U\), \(d\) and so on have to be specified.
    0 references
    Bingham fluid
    0 references
    frictional contact
    0 references
    subdifferential
    0 references
    variational inequality
    0 references
    weak solution
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references