Distributed control of systems governed by a general class of quasilinear elliptic equations (Q687498): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
Set OpenAlex properties.
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: Eduardo Casas / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Luis Alberto Fernandez / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Eduardo Casas / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / author
 
Property / author: Luis Alberto Fernandez / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1006/jdeq.1993.1062 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2081752976 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 02:23, 20 March 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Distributed control of systems governed by a general class of quasilinear elliptic equations
scientific article

    Statements

    Distributed control of systems governed by a general class of quasilinear elliptic equations (English)
    0 references
    25 October 1993
    0 references
    Let \(\Omega\) be a bounded open subset of \(\mathbb{R}^ N\) with Lipschitz continuous boundary; let \(a: \Omega\times \mathbb{R}^ N\to \mathbb{R}^ N\), \(a_ 0: \Omega\times\mathbb{R}\to \mathbb{R}\) be two Carathéodory functions, \(C^ 1\) in the second variable, such that \[ \sum_{i,j=1}^ N \partial_{N+i} a_ j (.,\eta) \xi_ i\xi_ j\geq \Lambda_ 1(k+| \eta|)^{\alpha-2} |\xi|^ 2, \qquad \sum_{i,j=1}^ N | \partial_{N+i} a_ j (.,\eta)|\leq \Lambda_ 2 (k+| \zeta|)^{\alpha-2}, \] \(0\leq \partial_{N+1} a_ 0(.,s)\leq f(| s|)\), \(a_ 0(.,0) =0\), \(a(.,0) =0\), for all \(\xi,\eta\in\mathbb{R}^ N\), \(s\in\mathbb{R}\), for some \(\Lambda_ 1,\Lambda_ 2>0\), \(k\in [0,1]\), \(\alpha\in ]1,+\infty[\), positive and non-decreasing function \(f\); \(y_ d\in L^ 2(\Omega)\); \(\varepsilon,\nu\geq 0\); let \({\mathbf K}\) be a nonempty, convex and closed subset of \(L^ 2(\Omega)\). Let \(A_ \varepsilon y=- \varepsilon\Delta y-\text{div } a(.,\nabla y)+ a_ 0(.,y)\), if \(u\in L^ 2(\Omega)\) let \(y_ \varepsilon(u)\in W_ 0^{1,\alpha} (\Omega)\cap L^ \infty(\Omega)\) such that \(A_ \varepsilon y_ \varepsilon(u)u\) in \(\Omega\), \(y_ \varepsilon(u)=0\) on \(\partial\Omega\); \(J:{\mathbf K}\to \mathbb{R}\), \(J(v)= {1\over 2} \int_ \Omega | y_ 0(v)- y_ d|^ 2 dx+ {\nu\over 2} \int_ \Omega | v|^ 2 dx\), if \(\varepsilon>0\) let \(J_ \varepsilon(v)= {1\over 2} \int_ \Omega | y_ \varepsilon(v)- y_ d|^ 2 dx+{\nu\over 2} \int_ \Omega | v|^ 2 dx+ {1\over 2} \int_ \Omega | v-\overline{u}|^ 2 dx\) where \(\overline{u}\) is a point of minimum for \(J\). Then the authors prove under suitable hypothesis the existence of \(y_ \varepsilon(u)\) and of the minimum of \(J\) and \(J_ \varepsilon\) and if \(\alpha\geq 2\) and \(k\neq 0\) the differentiability of the state with respect to the control and the optimality system of the problem. In order to deal with the case in which \(\alpha>2\) and \(k=0\) and with the case in which \(\alpha<2\) and \(k\neq 0\) they show in what sense the problems associated to \(J_ \varepsilon\) approximate that associated to \(J\) and pass to the unit in the optimality systems of the approximated problems also deducing the regularity of the optimal solution and of the optimal state.
    0 references
    optimality system
    0 references
    regularity of the optimal solution
    0 references
    optimal state
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers