Cotilting versus pure-injective modules. (Q1880111): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q114045259, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1709550817224 |
Set OpenAlex properties. |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2140/pjm.2003.212.321 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2085587720 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 03:03, 20 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Cotilting versus pure-injective modules. |
scientific article |
Statements
Cotilting versus pure-injective modules. (English)
0 references
17 September 2004
0 references
Let \(R\) be an associative ring. A left \(R\)-module \(_RW\) is said to be cotilting if the class of modules cogenerated by \(_RW\) coincides with the class of modules for which the functor \(\text{Ext}^1_R(-,W)\) vanishes. This paper explores the relation between cotilting modules and pure-injective modules. In fact, by a more recent result of \textit{S. Bazzoni} [Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 131, No. 12, 3665-3672 (2003; Zbl 1045.16004)], every cotilting module is pure-injective. Therefore, the results obtained in this paper for pure-injective cotilting modules are actually valid for all cotilting modules. Among them is the fact that if \(_RW_S\) is a cotilting bimodule, then \(R\) and \(S\) are semiregular rings and also the characterizations given of reflexive modules in terms of linear compactness conditions.
0 references
cotilting modules
0 references
pure-injective modules
0 references
reflexive modules
0 references
linearly compact modules
0 references