The first modern definition of the sum of a divergent series: An aspect of the rise of 20th century mathematics (Q1302117): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q54272451, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1710897659913 |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Detlef Laugwitz / rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Detlef Laugwitz / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004070050036 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1982246393 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Wikidata QID | |||
Property / Wikidata QID: Q54272451 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
links / mardi / name | links / mardi / name | ||
Latest revision as of 03:30, 20 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | The first modern definition of the sum of a divergent series: An aspect of the rise of 20th century mathematics |
scientific article |
Statements
The first modern definition of the sum of a divergent series: An aspect of the rise of 20th century mathematics (English)
0 references
13 March 2000
0 references
The work of Ernesto Cesàro (1859-1906) on divergent series during the 1880s was initially influenced by mathematicians at Naples and at Liège (Catalan). Until 1882 Cesàro used symbolic methods (umbral calculus). Then he employed means and asymptotic laws, in analogy to number theoretic functions, and also a probabilistic approach. Only in 1890 he defined the sum of a divergent series in the way that became named after him. The author views this as a case study on the transition from the earlier conception of a mathematical definition (as describing something that was already given by intuition or nature) to the modern mode (definitions as creating mathematical objects). [Reviewer's remark: This transition is a case of what is often termed loss of ontology.] In contrast to earlier historiography it is claimed here that Frobenius (1880), Hölder (1882) and Stieltjes (1882) remained within the bounds of the ordinary conception of a sum and did not intend to define summability methods. Their results, though, were transformed into such methods by Hardy and others.
0 references
E. Cesàro
0 references
divergent series
0 references