Design of a multiobjective reverse logistics network considering the cost and service level (Q1955359): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item |
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q58912695, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1711439739529 |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Property / describes a project that uses | |||
Property / describes a project that uses: SITATION / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/928620 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2133193951 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Wikidata QID | |||
Property / Wikidata QID: Q58912695 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 10:52, 26 March 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Design of a multiobjective reverse logistics network considering the cost and service level |
scientific article |
Statements
Design of a multiobjective reverse logistics network considering the cost and service level (English)
0 references
11 June 2013
0 references
Summary: Reverse logistics, which is induced by various forms of used products and materials, has received growing attention throughout this decade. In a highly competitive environment, the service level is an important criterion for reverse logistics network design. However, most previous studies about product returns only focused on the total cost of the reverse logistics and neglected the service level. To help a manufacturer of electronic products provide quality postsale repair service for their consumer, this paper proposes a multiobjective reverse logistics network optimisation model that considers the objectives of the cost, the total tardiness of the cycle time, and the coverage of customer zones. The Nondominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) is employed for solving this multiobjective optimisation model. To evaluate the performance of NSGA-II, a genetic algorithm based on weighted sum approach and Multiobjective Simulated Annealing (MOSA) are also applied. The performance of these three heuristic algorithms is compared using numerical examples. The computational results show that NSGA-II outperforms MOSA and the genetic algorithm based on weighted sum approach. Furthermore, the key parameters of the model are tested, and some conclusions are drawn.
0 references