Blanchfield forms and Gordian distance (Q329657): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claim: author (P16): Item:Q1025733
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: Marciej Borodzik / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1872197609 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / arXiv ID
 
Property / arXiv ID: 1409.8421 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 12:34, 18 April 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Blanchfield forms and Gordian distance
scientific article

    Statements

    Blanchfield forms and Gordian distance (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    21 October 2016
    0 references
    For oriented ordered links \(L\) and \(J\) in the \(3\)-sphere, the Gordian distance \(g(L,J)\) between them is the minimal number of crossing changes required to turn \(L\) into \(J\), and the \(4\)-dimensional clasp number \(c(L,J)\) is the minimal number of double points of an immersed concordance between them. The main purpose of the paper under review is to give lower bounds on these invariants from the Alexander modules and the Blanchfield pairings. The first result claims that the difference between the ranks of the Alexander modules of \(L\) and \(J\) is a lower bound for \(c(L,J)\), and if equality holds, then the Witt sum of the Blanchfield forms of the links is metabolic and there is a specified relation between their torsion Alexander polynomials. The first part of the result has been shown independently by \textit{A. Kawauchi} [Bol. Soc. Mat. Mex., III. Ser. 20, No. 2, 559--578 (2014; Zbl 1315.57012)]. A similar claim is also proved for the Gordian distance. The final part contains observations for unlinking numbers, splitting numbers, and weak splitting numbers. In particular, the authors give a two component link \(L\) with unknotted components for a given constant \(c\) such that for any single crossing change turning \(L\) into a split link, the resulting split link has a knotted component with crossing number at least \(c\). This gives a positive answer for crossing number to a question by \textit{C. Adams} [J. Knot Theory Ramifications 5, No. 3, 295--299 (1996; Zbl 0858.57007)].
    0 references
    Alexander module
    0 references
    Blanchfield form
    0 references
    Gordian distance
    0 references
    splitting number
    0 references
    unlinking number
    0 references

    Identifiers