Towards a generalisation of Noether's theorem to nonclassical Hopf-Galois structures (Q416769): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / review text
 
This paper offers an interesting contribution to Galois module theory in the setting of Hopf Galois theory. The governing question is the following: Given a finite extension \(L/K\) of local fields and a \(K\)-algebra \(A\) acting on \(L\), under which conditions will the ring \(O_L\) of integers be free over the so-called associated order \(\mathfrak A=\{\alpha\in A \mid \alpha O_L\subset O_L\}\)? The classical setting is a \(G\)-Galois extension \(L/K\), and \(A=K[G]\). If \(L/K\) is tame, then the associated order \(\mathfrak A\) is exactly \(O_K[G]\), and Noether's theorem says that \(O_K\) is free over it. Childs' monograph [\textit{L. N. Childs}, Taming wild extensions: Hopf algebras and local Galois module theory. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. 80. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society (AMS) (2000; Zbl 0944.11038)] proved much more generally that we have freeness if \(\mathfrak A\) is a Hopf order in \(A=K[G]\). Without any hypothesis one should not expect an affirmative answer, there are counterexamples. The present paper generalises this result to Hopf Galois extensions \(L/K\) in the sense of Greither-Pareigis (see loc. cit. or the original paper in [\textit{C. Greither} and \textit{B. Pareigis}, J. Algebra 106, 239--258 (1987; Zbl 0615.12026)]). The Hopf algebra \(H\) which plays the role of \(A\) now is a form of a group ring. The extension \(L/K\) need not even be Galois in the classical sense. There are two cases that are captured: either \(L/K\) is unramified, or the degree of \(L/K\) is coprime to the residue characteristic and \(H\) is commutative. In both cases the author shows that the associated order is Hopf. Basically this is descent theory. In the latter case the associated order turns out to be the \textit{maximal} order. In the former case, the situation is just the opposite: if \(E/K\) is a Galois extension splitting \(H\) (so \(E\otimes_K H\) is a group ring \(E[N]\)), then \(\mathfrak A\) is gotten by taking the \(\text{Gal}(E/K)\)-fixed points of the \textit{minimal} order \(O_E[N]\). In the final section, the author uses standard techniques to combine the local results into the following global result: Let \(L/K\) be a domestic extension of number fields, which is \(H\)-Galois for a finite commutative \(K\)-Hopf algebra \(H\). Then \(O_L\) is locally free over the associated order. (An extension \(L/K\) is called \textit{domestic} if no prime of \(K\) lying over a divisor \(p\) of the degree \([L:K]\) is ramified in \(L\). Note that this is considerably more restrictive than tameness.)
Property / review text: This paper offers an interesting contribution to Galois module theory in the setting of Hopf Galois theory. The governing question is the following: Given a finite extension \(L/K\) of local fields and a \(K\)-algebra \(A\) acting on \(L\), under which conditions will the ring \(O_L\) of integers be free over the so-called associated order \(\mathfrak A=\{\alpha\in A \mid \alpha O_L\subset O_L\}\)? The classical setting is a \(G\)-Galois extension \(L/K\), and \(A=K[G]\). If \(L/K\) is tame, then the associated order \(\mathfrak A\) is exactly \(O_K[G]\), and Noether's theorem says that \(O_K\) is free over it. Childs' monograph [\textit{L. N. Childs}, Taming wild extensions: Hopf algebras and local Galois module theory. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. 80. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society (AMS) (2000; Zbl 0944.11038)] proved much more generally that we have freeness if \(\mathfrak A\) is a Hopf order in \(A=K[G]\). Without any hypothesis one should not expect an affirmative answer, there are counterexamples. The present paper generalises this result to Hopf Galois extensions \(L/K\) in the sense of Greither-Pareigis (see loc. cit. or the original paper in [\textit{C. Greither} and \textit{B. Pareigis}, J. Algebra 106, 239--258 (1987; Zbl 0615.12026)]). The Hopf algebra \(H\) which plays the role of \(A\) now is a form of a group ring. The extension \(L/K\) need not even be Galois in the classical sense. There are two cases that are captured: either \(L/K\) is unramified, or the degree of \(L/K\) is coprime to the residue characteristic and \(H\) is commutative. In both cases the author shows that the associated order is Hopf. Basically this is descent theory. In the latter case the associated order turns out to be the \textit{maximal} order. In the former case, the situation is just the opposite: if \(E/K\) is a Galois extension splitting \(H\) (so \(E\otimes_K H\) is a group ring \(E[N]\)), then \(\mathfrak A\) is gotten by taking the \(\text{Gal}(E/K)\)-fixed points of the \textit{minimal} order \(O_E[N]\). In the final section, the author uses standard techniques to combine the local results into the following global result: Let \(L/K\) be a domestic extension of number fields, which is \(H\)-Galois for a finite commutative \(K\)-Hopf algebra \(H\). Then \(O_L\) is locally free over the associated order. (An extension \(L/K\) is called \textit{domestic} if no prime of \(K\) lying over a divisor \(p\) of the degree \([L:K]\) is ramified in \(L\). Note that this is considerably more restrictive than tameness.) / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Cornelius Greither / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 11R33 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID
 
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 14L30 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH DE Number
 
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6032696 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
Noether's theorem
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Noether's theorem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
integral normal basis
Property / zbMATH Keywords: integral normal basis / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
Hopf orders
Property / zbMATH Keywords: Hopf orders / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
associated orders
Property / zbMATH Keywords: associated orders / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / zbMATH Keywords
 
descent
Property / zbMATH Keywords: descent / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / arXiv ID
 
Property / arXiv ID: 1001.1639 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 13:26, 18 April 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Towards a generalisation of Noether's theorem to nonclassical Hopf-Galois structures
scientific article

    Statements

    Towards a generalisation of Noether's theorem to nonclassical Hopf-Galois structures (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    10 May 2012
    0 references
    This paper offers an interesting contribution to Galois module theory in the setting of Hopf Galois theory. The governing question is the following: Given a finite extension \(L/K\) of local fields and a \(K\)-algebra \(A\) acting on \(L\), under which conditions will the ring \(O_L\) of integers be free over the so-called associated order \(\mathfrak A=\{\alpha\in A \mid \alpha O_L\subset O_L\}\)? The classical setting is a \(G\)-Galois extension \(L/K\), and \(A=K[G]\). If \(L/K\) is tame, then the associated order \(\mathfrak A\) is exactly \(O_K[G]\), and Noether's theorem says that \(O_K\) is free over it. Childs' monograph [\textit{L. N. Childs}, Taming wild extensions: Hopf algebras and local Galois module theory. Mathematical Surveys and Monographs. 80. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society (AMS) (2000; Zbl 0944.11038)] proved much more generally that we have freeness if \(\mathfrak A\) is a Hopf order in \(A=K[G]\). Without any hypothesis one should not expect an affirmative answer, there are counterexamples. The present paper generalises this result to Hopf Galois extensions \(L/K\) in the sense of Greither-Pareigis (see loc. cit. or the original paper in [\textit{C. Greither} and \textit{B. Pareigis}, J. Algebra 106, 239--258 (1987; Zbl 0615.12026)]). The Hopf algebra \(H\) which plays the role of \(A\) now is a form of a group ring. The extension \(L/K\) need not even be Galois in the classical sense. There are two cases that are captured: either \(L/K\) is unramified, or the degree of \(L/K\) is coprime to the residue characteristic and \(H\) is commutative. In both cases the author shows that the associated order is Hopf. Basically this is descent theory. In the latter case the associated order turns out to be the \textit{maximal} order. In the former case, the situation is just the opposite: if \(E/K\) is a Galois extension splitting \(H\) (so \(E\otimes_K H\) is a group ring \(E[N]\)), then \(\mathfrak A\) is gotten by taking the \(\text{Gal}(E/K)\)-fixed points of the \textit{minimal} order \(O_E[N]\). In the final section, the author uses standard techniques to combine the local results into the following global result: Let \(L/K\) be a domestic extension of number fields, which is \(H\)-Galois for a finite commutative \(K\)-Hopf algebra \(H\). Then \(O_L\) is locally free over the associated order. (An extension \(L/K\) is called \textit{domestic} if no prime of \(K\) lying over a divisor \(p\) of the degree \([L:K]\) is ramified in \(L\). Note that this is considerably more restrictive than tameness.)
    0 references
    Noether's theorem
    0 references
    integral normal basis
    0 references
    Hopf orders
    0 references
    associated orders
    0 references
    descent
    0 references

    Identifiers