Is the notion of time really fundamental? (Q527569): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
Changed an Item |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Property / review text | |||
Summary: From the physics point of view, time is now best described through General Relativity as part of space-time, which is a dynamical object encoding gravity. Time possesses also some intrinsic irreversibility due to thermodynamics and quantum mechanical effects. This irreversibility can look puzzling since time-like loops (and hence time machines) can appear in General Relativity (for example in the Gödel universe, a solution of Einstein's equations). We take this apparent discrepancy as a warning bell, pointing out that time as we understand it might not be fundamental and that whatever theory lying beyond General Relativity may not include time as we know it as a fundamental structure. We propose therefore, following the philosophy of analog models of gravity, that time and gravity might not be fundamental per se, but only emergent features. We illustrate our proposal using a toy-model where we show how the Lorentzian signature and Nordström gravity (a diffeomorphisms invariant scalar gravity theory) can emerge from a timeless non-dynamical space. This article received the fourth prize at the essay competition of the Foundational Questions Institute on the nature of time. | |||
Property / review text: Summary: From the physics point of view, time is now best described through General Relativity as part of space-time, which is a dynamical object encoding gravity. Time possesses also some intrinsic irreversibility due to thermodynamics and quantum mechanical effects. This irreversibility can look puzzling since time-like loops (and hence time machines) can appear in General Relativity (for example in the Gödel universe, a solution of Einstein's equations). We take this apparent discrepancy as a warning bell, pointing out that time as we understand it might not be fundamental and that whatever theory lying beyond General Relativity may not include time as we know it as a fundamental structure. We propose therefore, following the philosophy of analog models of gravity, that time and gravity might not be fundamental per se, but only emergent features. We illustrate our proposal using a toy-model where we show how the Lorentzian signature and Nordström gravity (a diffeomorphisms invariant scalar gravity theory) can emerge from a timeless non-dynamical space. This article received the fourth prize at the essay competition of the Foundational Questions Institute on the nature of time. / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID | |||
Property / Mathematics Subject Classification ID: 83D05 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number | |||
Property / zbMATH DE Number: 6714449 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
emergent gravity | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: emergent gravity / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
scalar gravity | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: scalar gravity / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords | |||
signature change | |||
Property / zbMATH Keywords: signature change / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / Wikidata QID | |||
Property / Wikidata QID: Q62580606 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2145247087 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / arXiv ID | |||
Property / arXiv ID: 0903.4876 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
links / mardi / name | links / mardi / name | ||
Latest revision as of 15:46, 18 April 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Is the notion of time really fundamental? |
scientific article |
Statements
Is the notion of time really fundamental? (English)
0 references
12 May 2017
0 references
Summary: From the physics point of view, time is now best described through General Relativity as part of space-time, which is a dynamical object encoding gravity. Time possesses also some intrinsic irreversibility due to thermodynamics and quantum mechanical effects. This irreversibility can look puzzling since time-like loops (and hence time machines) can appear in General Relativity (for example in the Gödel universe, a solution of Einstein's equations). We take this apparent discrepancy as a warning bell, pointing out that time as we understand it might not be fundamental and that whatever theory lying beyond General Relativity may not include time as we know it as a fundamental structure. We propose therefore, following the philosophy of analog models of gravity, that time and gravity might not be fundamental per se, but only emergent features. We illustrate our proposal using a toy-model where we show how the Lorentzian signature and Nordström gravity (a diffeomorphisms invariant scalar gravity theory) can emerge from a timeless non-dynamical space. This article received the fourth prize at the essay competition of the Foundational Questions Institute on the nature of time.
0 references
emergent gravity
0 references
scalar gravity
0 references
signature change
0 references