A quantitative ergodic theory proof of Szemerédi's theorem (Q870018): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: Terence C. Tao / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Štefan Porubský / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Terence C. Tao / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Štefan Porubský / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / arXiv ID
 
Property / arXiv ID: math/0405251 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 18:18, 18 April 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A quantitative ergodic theory proof of Szemerédi's theorem
scientific article

    Statements

    A quantitative ergodic theory proof of Szemerédi's theorem (English)
    0 references
    12 March 2007
    0 references
    The paper starts with a short discussion of some main ideas on which the known proofs of Szemerédi's theorem on arithmetic progressions of length \(k\) are based (the combinatorial ones, proofs using ergodic theory, Gowers' proof using Fourier theory and the proof based on the hypergraph regularity lemma). This can be not only useful for an interested beginner in the subject, but also explains the author's motivation for a new ergodic proof of Szemerédi's \(k\)-term arithmetic subprogressions theorem given in the paper. The proof does not depend on the axiom of choice, nor on an infinite set of measures, the use of Fourier transform or inverse theorems of additive combinatorics. The author characterizes the proof as a ``finitary'' and ``quantitative'' version of the ergodic Furstenberg proof. The reading of the paper does not require familiarity with other proofs, but the author discusses on many places their relationship to the presented one. The proof also implies explicit quantitative bounds, though very poor.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    van der Waerden theorem
    0 references
    Szemerédi theorem
    0 references
    Furstenberg ergodic proof
    0 references
    Gowers proof
    0 references
    Fourier analysis
    0 references
    ergodig theory
    0 references
    inverse theory
    0 references
    hypergraph regularity lemma
    0 references
    van der Corput lemma
    0 references
    generalized von Neumann theorem
    0 references
    Gowers norms
    0 references
    Gowers uniform functions
    0 references
    uniformity norms
    0 references
    almost periodic functions
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references