Sobolev mappings: Lipschitz density is not a bi-Lipschitz invariant of the target (Q2370118): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Removed claim: reviewed by (P1447): Item:Q180886 |
Changed an Item |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Bohumír Opic / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2020899366 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / arXiv ID | |||
Property / arXiv ID: math/0602029 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 06:03, 19 April 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Sobolev mappings: Lipschitz density is not a bi-Lipschitz invariant of the target |
scientific article |
Statements
Sobolev mappings: Lipschitz density is not a bi-Lipschitz invariant of the target (English)
0 references
22 June 2007
0 references
If \(n\in \mathbb N\), \(n\geq 2\), then there is a compact connected set \(X\subset \mathbb R^{n+2}\) and a bi-Lipschitz homeomorphism \(\Phi : \mathbb R^{n+2} \rightarrow \mathbb R^{n+2}\) such that, for any closed \(n\)-dimensional manifold \(M\), smooth mappings \(C^{\infty}(M,X)\) are dense in the Sobolev class \(W^{1,n} (M,X)\), but Lipschitz mappings Lip\((M,Y)\) are not dense in \(W^{1,n} (M,Y)\), where \(Y = \Phi(X)\). This is one of the main results of the paper. Note also that the class of Sobolev mappings \(W^{1,n}(M,X)\) is defined by \[ W^{1,n} (M,X) :=\{u\in W^{1,n} (M,\mathbb R^{n+2}) : u (x) \in X \;\text{a.e.}\} \] and is equipped with the metric of the Sobolev norm \(W^{1,n}\), i.e., \(\rho(u,v) := \| u-v\| _{1,n}\) for all \(u,v\in W^{1,n}(M,X)\).
0 references
Sobolev mappings
0 references
metric spaces
0 references
closed manifolds
0 references
approximation
0 references