Necessary and sufficient conditions for existence of exponential dichotomy of impulsive equations (Q1200439): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Dichotomies in stability theory / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Existence of dichotomies and invariant splittings for linear differential systems. I / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3832890 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Characteristic exponents of impulsive differential equations in a Banach space / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 10:56, 17 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Necessary and sufficient conditions for existence of exponential dichotomy of impulsive equations
scientific article

    Statements

    Necessary and sufficient conditions for existence of exponential dichotomy of impulsive equations (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    16 January 1993
    0 references
    Let \(X\) be a Hilbert space and \(L(X)\) be the space of linear bounded operators acting in \(X\). The linear impulsive differential equation (1) \(dx/dt=A(t)x\) \((t\neq t_ n)\), (2) \(x(t^ +_ n)=Q_ nx(t_ n)\) is considered. Here \(A:R_ +\to L(X)\) is continuous on each interval \([t_ n,t_{n+1}]\); \(Q_ n\), \(Q^{-1}_ n\in L(X)\), the points \(t_ n\) satisfy the condition \(t_ n<t_{n+1}(n\in N)\), \(\lim_{n\to\infty}t_ n=\infty\). Let \(U(t)\) be the Cauchy operator of (1), (2), \(U(0)=I\). The equation (1), (2) is said to be generalized exponentially dichotomous if there exist positive functions \(\mu_ 1(t)\) and \(\mu_ 2(t)\), a constant \(M\) and projector \(P\) for which the following inequalities are valid: \[ \| U(t)PU^{-1}(S)\|\leq M\exp[-\int^ t_ s\mu_ 1(\tau)d\tau] (0\leq s\leq t<\infty) \] \[ \| U(t)(I-P)U^{-1}(s)\|\leq M\exp[-\int^ s_ t\mu_ 2(\tau)d\tau] (0\leq t\leq s<\infty). \] If the functions \(\mu_ 1(t)\) and \(\mu_ 2(t)\) satisfy the inequality \(\int^ b_ a\mu_ i(\tau)d\tau\leq\mu(b-a)\) \((a\leq b;\;i=1,2;\mu=\text{const})\) then (1), (2) is said to be exponentially dichotomous. The equation (1), (2) is said to be of bounded growth if for some fixed \(h>0\) there exists a constant \(C\geq 1\) such that each solution \(x(t)\) satisfies the condition \(\| x(t)\|\leq C\| x(s)\|\) for \(a\leq t\leq s+h\). Theorem 1. Let the impulsive equation (1), (2) be generalized exponentially dichotomous and let \(\mu_ i(t)\geq\varepsilon_ 0>0\) \((t\in R_ +)\). Then there exists an operator-valued function \(H(t)\) \((0\leq t<\infty)\) with the following properties: 1. \(H(t)\) is continuously differentiable for \(t\in R_ +\), has points of discontinuity of the first kind at \(t=t_ n\) and is bounded. 2. \(H(t)\) is a self-adjoint operator for each \(t\in R_ +\). 3. \((C(t)z,z)\to- \eta\| z\|^ 2\) \((z\in X)\) where \(\eta>0\) is a constant and \(C(t)=H'(t)+H(t)A(t)+A^*(t)H(t)\). In another theorem the conditions by which the exponential dichotomy of equation (1), (2) follows from the condition of bounded growth are given.
    0 references
    Hilbert space
    0 references
    linear impulsive differential equation
    0 references
    bounded growth
    0 references
    exponential dichotomy
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references