Global optimization methods for multimodal inverse problems (Q1206569): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3777555 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3691303 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3997001 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Optimization by Simulated Annealing / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Stochastic Relaxation, Gibbs Distributions, and the Bayesian Restoration of Images / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3785827 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4079017 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3833646 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4692508 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Combining renormalization group and multigrid methods / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3994799 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Non-negative matrices and Markov chains. 2nd ed / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Regularisation of nonlinear inverse problems: imaging the near-surface weathering layer / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 14:34, 17 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Global optimization methods for multimodal inverse problems
scientific article

    Statements

    Global optimization methods for multimodal inverse problems (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1 April 1993
    0 references
    The authors compare the practical efficiency of simulated annealing versus genetic algorithm for the inversion of a one-dimensional seismogram. The implementation is carefully discussed. They observe a good behaviour of both algorithms for a number of parameters up to 22; with 30 parameters the genetic algorithm can still solve the problem, whereas simulated annealing is defeated.
    0 references
    global optimization
    0 references
    inverse problems
    0 references
    practical efficiency
    0 references
    simulated annealing
    0 references
    genetic algorithm
    0 references
    seismogram
    0 references
    implementation
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references