``A la Burstall'' intermittent assertions induction principles for proving inevitability properties of programs (Q689297): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: Patrick Cousot / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Radhia Cousot / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Patrick Cousot / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / author
 
Property / author: Radhia Cousot / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3673097 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Countable nondeterminism and random assignment / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4054648 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: ``A la Burstall'' intermittent assertions induction principles for proving inevitability properties of programs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Sometime = always + recursion \(\equiv\) always. On the equivalence of the intermittent and invariant assertions methods for proving inevitability properties of programs / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3962450 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5584402 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: First-order dynamic logic / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4745241 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Is “sometime” sometimes better than “always”? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4136512 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 10:38, 22 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
``A la Burstall'' intermittent assertions induction principles for proving inevitability properties of programs
scientific article

    Statements

    ``A la Burstall'' intermittent assertions induction principles for proving inevitability properties of programs (English)
    0 references
    2 June 1994
    0 references
    The paper generalizes Burstall's (and that of Manna and Waldinger) intermittent assertions method to handle some properties of nondeterministic and parallel programs. Thus, as in operational semantics of programming languages, programs are modeled by transition systems, and program execution by complete traces. Termination and total correctness are modeled by inevitability properties, which are proved by Burstall's method and by some more abstract induction principles which generalise Burstall's method. The soundness, completeness and semantic completeness of this induction principle is proved. As the authors say, this study should be extended so as to take fairness hypotheses for parallel programs into account, and in order to obtain better presentations for logic programming.
    0 references
    0 references
    nondeterministic programs
    0 references
    parallel programs
    0 references
    transition systems
    0 references
    induction principles
    0 references
    semantic completeness
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers