Some descriptive-set-theoretical problems in complexity theory (Q1328888): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.2977/prims/1195168210 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2008067104 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Relativizations of the $\mathcal{P} = ?\mathcal{NP}$ Question / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3996675 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Comparing complexity classes / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5812175 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Descriptive set theory / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5573961 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Relationships between nondeterministic and deterministic tape complexities / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 16:39, 22 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Some descriptive-set-theoretical problems in complexity theory
scientific article

    Statements

    Some descriptive-set-theoretical problems in complexity theory (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1992
    0 references
    Summary: We bring some descriptive-set-theoretical problems into complexity theory. We here deal with the uniformization problem and the separation problem. It is shown that 1) there exists an oracle \(A\) such that for some set \(S\in {\mathbf P}[A]\) the uniformizator \(U_ s\) is not in \({\mathbf {NP}}[A]\), 2) there is an oracle \(A\) such that \(\text{Sep} ({\mathbf {NP}} [A])\) does not hold and hence so does not \(\text{Unif} ({\mathbf {coNP}}[A])\), and 3) there is an oracle \(A\) such that \(\text{sep} ({\mathbf{NEXT}} [A])\) does not hold and hence so does not \(\text{Unif} ({\mathbf {coNEXT}} [A])\).
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    uniformization problem
    0 references
    separation problem
    0 references
    oracle
    0 references
    0 references