Iterated relative recursive enumerability (Q1344547): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Pseudo Jump Operators. I: The R. E. Case / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Pseudo-jump operators. II: Transfinite iterations, hierarchies and minimal covers / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3657980 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 11:56, 23 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Iterated relative recursive enumerability
scientific article

    Statements

    Iterated relative recursive enumerability (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    20 April 1995
    0 references
    A result of Soare and Stob asserts that for any non-recursive r.e. set \(C\), there exists a r.e.\([C]\) set \(A\) such that \(A \oplus C\) is not of r.e. degree. A set \(Y\) is called [of] \(m\)-REA (\(m\)-REA\([C]\)) [degree] iff it is [Turing equivalent to] the result of applying \(m\)-many iterated `hops' to the empty set (to \(C\)), where a hop is any function of the form \(X \mapsto X \oplus W^ X_ e\). The cited result is the special case \(m = 0\), \(n = 1\) of our Theorem. For \(m = 0,1\), and any \((m + 1)\)-REA set \(C\), if \(C\) is not of \(m\)-REA degree, then for all \(n\) there exists an \(n\)-r.e.\([C]\) set \(A\) such that \(A \oplus C\) is not of \((m + n)\)-REA degree. We conjecture that this holds also for \(m \geq 2\).
    0 references
    0 references
    recursively enumerable set
    0 references
    recursively enumerable degree
    0 references
    iterated hops
    0 references
    \(m\)-REA degree
    0 references