The structure and evolution of competition-organized ecological communities (Q1898322): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1216/rmjm/1181072292 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1978791163 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Character displacement and niche shift analyzed using consumer-resource models of competition / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3787835 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4026724 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3040961 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5572869 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Revision as of 16:18, 23 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The structure and evolution of competition-organized ecological communities
scientific article

    Statements

    The structure and evolution of competition-organized ecological communities (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    10 March 1997
    0 references
    It frequently is asserted that conservation biology can advance only by transcending the current species-by-species approach and refocusing on whole-ecosystem preservation. But a strong scientific basis does not presently exist for carrying out ecosystem viability analyses, and in particular the theory of community ecology seems to be in disarray. Even classical equilibrium coevolutionary theory, which remains the basis for much subsequent work, seems to have dissolved into controversy, with disputes over what had seemed previously to have been settled principles. It is our view that much of this confusion and controversy has resulted from an excessive level of abstraction in the models employed, making it difficult to distinguish between individual and group control mechanisms, and confounding behavioral and evolutionary processes of adaptation. Our response is to present a more mechanistic, less phenomenological class of models, in which these separate controls and processes are explicitly distinguished. To our knowledge, ours is the first attempt to systematically incorporate both behavioral optimization and strategic evolutionary processes into a single model. This article is the first of several that we intend to devote to this subject. Here we describe the model precisely and undertake its theoretical analysis.
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references