\(2\)-perfect \(m\)-cycle systems can be equationally defined for \(m=3\), \(5\), and \(7\) only (Q1906520): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claims
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: Darryn E. Bryant / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / author
 
Property / author: Charles C. Lindner / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4033704 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Varieties of quasigroups arising from 2-perfect \(m\)-cycle systems / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3983102 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Steiner pentagon systems / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3981348 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Concerning the number of mutually orthogonal latin squares / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Decompositions of edge-colored complete graphs / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 10:30, 24 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
\(2\)-perfect \(m\)-cycle systems can be equationally defined for \(m=3\), \(5\), and \(7\) only
scientific article

    Statements

    \(2\)-perfect \(m\)-cycle systems can be equationally defined for \(m=3\), \(5\), and \(7\) only (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    25 February 1996
    0 references
    A natural quasigroup associated with a 2-perfect \(m\)-cycle system is examined, and it is shown that except when the cycle length \(m\) is 3, 5, or 7, the 2-perfect \(m\)-cycle systems cannot be equationally defined. The proof proceeds by producing a quasigroup associated with a 2-perfect \(m\)-cycle system, for which a particular homomorphic image does not arise from a 2-perfect \(m\)-cycle system.
    0 references
    0 references
    cycle system
    0 references
    cycle decomposition
    0 references
    quasigroup
    0 references
    2-perfect \(m\)-cycle systems
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references