Logic, states, and quantum probabilities (Q1916268): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Nicolas Hadjisavvas / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Nicolas Hadjisavvas / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q2884962 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A statistical analysis of the two-slit experiment: Or some remarks on quantum probability / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3712305 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3866110 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5551052 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5661846 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5847989 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 13:03, 24 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Logic, states, and quantum probabilities
scientific article

    Statements

    Logic, states, and quantum probabilities (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    13 January 1997
    0 references
    In this paper it is claimed that all mechanical theories (including quantum mechanics) use a logic which is distributive. No kind of mathematical proof or physical evidence is given to support this claim. The definitions given are inexact (for instance, in an attempt to investigate a logic which is not two-valued, a valuation is defined as a map \(h : L \to \{t,f\}\); it is then written: ``if \(h(a) \notin \{t,f\}\) then \(\dots\)''). Mathematical terms are used improperly (``predicates \(\dots\) when assigned a truth value, express a proposition''). Proofs are trivial or non-existent.
    0 references
    0 references