Static modules and Clifford theories (Q1364311): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Latest revision as of 18:19, 27 May 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Static modules and Clifford theories |
scientific article |
Statements
Static modules and Clifford theories (English)
0 references
25 January 1998
0 references
Let \(A\) be a ring and denote by Mod-\(A\) the category of right \(A\)-modules. Assume that \(M\) is a self-small \(A\)-module and let \(D=\text{End}_AM\). Then the category of \(A\)-modules which divide a direct sum of copies of \(M\) is equivalent to the category of projective \(D\)-modules. Let further \(\rho\colon A\to B\) be a ring homomorphism, \(K=M\otimes_AB\), \(E=\text{End}_B(K)\) and \(F=\text{End}_A(K)\). Denote by \(\text{Mod}(B|A\text{-split})\) the category of \(B\)-modules having a \(K\)-presentation which splits upon restriction to \(A\), and by \(\text{Mod}(E|\text{Res}_F)\) the category of \(E\)-modules \(W\) for which \(W\otimes_EF\) is a projective \(F\)-module. By a result of \textit{J. Alperin} [J. Aust. Math. Soc., Ser. A 49, No. 3, 347-353 (1990; Zbl 0739.16008)], the restrictions of the functors \(\text{Hom}_B(K,-)\) and \(-\otimes_E K\) determine an equivalence between these categories. The authors prove that the above mentioned theorems are in fact equivalent, since it turns out that \(\text{Mod}(B|A\text{-split})\) coincides with the category of \(B\)-modules which divide a direct sum of copies of \(K\), while \(\text{Mod}(E|\text{Res}_F)\) coincides with the category of projective \(E\)-modules.
0 references
static modules
0 references
endomorphism rings
0 references
Auslander equivalences
0 references
non-normal Clifford theories
0 references
categories of modules
0 references
equivalences of categories
0 references
projective modules
0 references