A constructive formulation of Gleason's theorem (Q1372943): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Created a new Item |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Pawel Kruszynski / rank | |||
Property / reviewed by | |||
Property / reviewed by: Pawel Kruszynski / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Constructivism in mathematics. An introduction. Volume I / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Gleason's theorem is not constructively provable / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3751554 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: An elementary proof of Gleason's theorem / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4747057 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
links / mardi / name | links / mardi / name | ||
Latest revision as of 18:52, 27 May 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | A constructive formulation of Gleason's theorem |
scientific article |
Statements
A constructive formulation of Gleason's theorem (English)
0 references
4 November 1997
0 references
The paper is devoted to a constructive reformulation of Gleason's Theorem, classically equivalent to the standard formulation, such that for this form of the theorem Hellman's counterexample [\textit{G. Hellman}, J. Philos. Logic 22, No. 2, 193-203 (1993; Zbl 0785.03041)], is not valid. However, the constructive proof of Gleason's Theorem is not known yet. Gleason's Theorem is a fundamental theorem for representation of states in quantum mechanics. Its constructive form would have great mathematical and philosophical consequences.
0 references
constructive mathematics
0 references
Gleason's Theorem
0 references
Hellman's counterexample
0 references
representation of states in quantum mechanics
0 references