Applications of Frobenius algebras to representation theory of Schur algebras (Q1378449): Difference between revisions

Let \(R\) be a commutative ring with identity, \(G\) a finite group, and \(RG\) the group ring of \(G\) over \(R\), with basis \(\{u_g\mid g\in G\}\) in one-to-one correspondence with \(G\). Let \(\{E_g\mid g\in G\}\) be a partition of \(G\), with \(g\in E_g\) and \(E_g^{-1}=E_{g^{-1}}\) for all \(g\in G\), and let \(G_0\) be a set of representatives of the \(E_g\) and put \(s_g=\sum_{x\in E_g} u_x\). If \(S=\bigoplus_{g\in G_0} Rs_g\) is a subalgebra with unit \(1_S\) of \(RG\), \(S\) is said to be a Schur algebra in \(RG\). The authors consider here the relationship between indecomposable modules for \(RG\) and those for \(S\), for two types of Schur algebras. The first type is the double coset algebra determined by a subgroup \(H\) of \(G\), with \(| H|\) a unit in \(R\). It is \(\varepsilon RG\varepsilon\), where \(\varepsilon=| H|^{-1}\sum_{h\in H} u_h\). This is actually discussed in the more general context of Hecke algebras. The second setting is that of fixed rings of automorphism groups arising from automorphisms of \(G\). Furthermore, a theory of characters and class functions for Schur algebras is presented. In all, the paper contains a great deal of information of interest to those who work in this area.