Riesz and Lodato reflections. III (Q1297733): Difference between revisions

This paper is the third part of an interesting series of papers under the same title [ibid. 73, No. 1-2, 111-128 (1996; Zbl 0914.54006); 73, No. 3, 201-212 (1996; Zbl 0914.54007)]. In the first part of the present paper, the author looks for rules on the length of the sequence \((G^L_\alpha)\) in the \(T_1\)-case, where \(G\) is a screen on \(X\) and \(\alpha\) is a limit ordinal. He establishes that the Lodato behaviour of \(G^L_\alpha\) depends essentially on the behaviour of the induced closure \(c(G)\). In the second part, the author studies the behaviour of the sequence \((\mathfrak m^L_\alpha)\) for an \(m\)-looseness \(\mathfrak m\), dropping the hypothesis that the induced closure \(c(\mathfrak m)\) is \(T_1\) (the \(T_1\)-case has been already studied in the second paper of this sequel). As usual, the author in his study is thorough and offers nice examples and results.