Ordering points by linear functionals (Q1964657): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2072767456 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Fiber polytopes / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Theory of Matroids / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3684752 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: 2N noncollinear points determine at least 2N directions / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Facing up to arrangements: face-count formulas for partitions of space by hyperplanes / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 12:02, 29 May 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Ordering points by linear functionals |
scientific article |
Statements
Ordering points by linear functionals (English)
0 references
16 June 2002
0 references
Let \(\mathcal C\) denote a configuration of points in \({\mathbb R}^n\). Fixing a generic direction \(\vec{v}\) in \({\mathbb R}^n\) yields a linear ordering of the points of \(\mathcal C\). The author establishes upper and lower bounds on the number \(f({\mathcal C})\) of such orderings, using results from matroid theory. Let \(\mathcal A\) denote the arrangement of hyperplanes orthogonal to the difference vectors \(x - y\) for \(x,y\in {\mathcal C}\). Then \(\vec{v}\) is generic if and only if \(\vec{v}\) lies in the complement of \(\mathcal A\), and two directions \(\vec{v}\) and \(\vec{w}\) induce the same order on \(\mathcal C\) if and only if they lie in the same component of the complement. Then the number of linear orderings is expressed in terms of Whitney numbers of the geometric lattice associated with \(\mathcal A\). If \(\mathcal C\) is a basis for \({\mathbb R}^n\) then \(\mathcal A\) is the arrangement associated with the root system of type \(A_{n-1}\). Loosely speaking, the author shows that every other case can be obtained from this one via iterated truncations and weak maps. These operations cannot increase Whitney numbers, so one obtains an upper bound on \(f({\mathcal C})\) in terms of Stirling numbers, the Whitney numbers associated with the \(A_{n-1}\) arrangement. Lower bounds on \(f({\mathcal C})\) in general are difficult to come by. For \(n=2\) this is equivalent to the slope problem: to determine the minimum number of slopes determined by \(k\) points in the plane. This was solved by \textit{P. Ungar} [J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A 33, 343-347 (1982; Zbl 0496.05001)]. Here Edelman establishes a lower bound for arbitrary \(n\) in terms of falling factorials, but only for generic configurations. He conjectures a specific lower bound for configurations in slope-general position, i.e., configurations of \(k\) points that determine \(k\choose 2\) different slopes. A coherent monotone path on a polytope is an edge-path which is monotonic increasing relative to some direction. In the last section the author shows how to construct from a given zonotope \(Z\) a configuration \({\mathcal C}(Z)\) such that \(f({\mathcal C}(Z))\) is precisely the number of coherent monotone paths on \(Z\).
0 references
configuration
0 references
linear ordering
0 references
arrangement of hyperplanes
0 references
characteristic polynomial
0 references
Stirling numbers
0 references
monotone paths
0 references
matroid theory
0 references
Whitney numbers
0 references