Ordering points by linear functionals (Q1964657): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2072767456 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Fiber polytopes / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Theory of Matroids / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3684752 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: 2N noncollinear points determine at least 2N directions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Facing up to arrangements: face-count formulas for partitions of space by hyperplanes / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 12:02, 29 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Ordering points by linear functionals
scientific article

    Statements

    Ordering points by linear functionals (English)
    0 references
    16 June 2002
    0 references
    Let \(\mathcal C\) denote a configuration of points in \({\mathbb R}^n\). Fixing a generic direction \(\vec{v}\) in \({\mathbb R}^n\) yields a linear ordering of the points of \(\mathcal C\). The author establishes upper and lower bounds on the number \(f({\mathcal C})\) of such orderings, using results from matroid theory. Let \(\mathcal A\) denote the arrangement of hyperplanes orthogonal to the difference vectors \(x - y\) for \(x,y\in {\mathcal C}\). Then \(\vec{v}\) is generic if and only if \(\vec{v}\) lies in the complement of \(\mathcal A\), and two directions \(\vec{v}\) and \(\vec{w}\) induce the same order on \(\mathcal C\) if and only if they lie in the same component of the complement. Then the number of linear orderings is expressed in terms of Whitney numbers of the geometric lattice associated with \(\mathcal A\). If \(\mathcal C\) is a basis for \({\mathbb R}^n\) then \(\mathcal A\) is the arrangement associated with the root system of type \(A_{n-1}\). Loosely speaking, the author shows that every other case can be obtained from this one via iterated truncations and weak maps. These operations cannot increase Whitney numbers, so one obtains an upper bound on \(f({\mathcal C})\) in terms of Stirling numbers, the Whitney numbers associated with the \(A_{n-1}\) arrangement. Lower bounds on \(f({\mathcal C})\) in general are difficult to come by. For \(n=2\) this is equivalent to the slope problem: to determine the minimum number of slopes determined by \(k\) points in the plane. This was solved by \textit{P. Ungar} [J. Comb. Theory, Ser. A 33, 343-347 (1982; Zbl 0496.05001)]. Here Edelman establishes a lower bound for arbitrary \(n\) in terms of falling factorials, but only for generic configurations. He conjectures a specific lower bound for configurations in slope-general position, i.e., configurations of \(k\) points that determine \(k\choose 2\) different slopes. A coherent monotone path on a polytope is an edge-path which is monotonic increasing relative to some direction. In the last section the author shows how to construct from a given zonotope \(Z\) a configuration \({\mathcal C}(Z)\) such that \(f({\mathcal C}(Z))\) is precisely the number of coherent monotone paths on \(Z\).
    0 references
    configuration
    0 references
    linear ordering
    0 references
    arrangement of hyperplanes
    0 references
    characteristic polynomial
    0 references
    Stirling numbers
    0 references
    monotone paths
    0 references
    matroid theory
    0 references
    Whitney numbers
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references