Is the Regge calculus a consistent approximation to general relativity? (Q1582422): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Regge calculus: a brief review and bibliography / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A fully -dimensional Regge calculus model of the Kasner cosmology / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Regge calculus as a fourth-order method in numerical relativity / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5536978 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Particle paths in a Schwarzschild spacetime via the Regge calculus / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Two cosmological solutions of Regge calculus / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A convergence result for linearised Regge calculus / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3135405 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Riemann normal coordinates, smooth lattices and numerical relativity / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An ADM 3 <i>+</i> 1 formulation for smooth lattice general relativity / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 16:14, 30 May 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Is the Regge calculus a consistent approximation to general relativity?
scientific article

    Statements

    Is the Regge calculus a consistent approximation to general relativity? (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    25 April 2002
    0 references
    We will ask the question of whether or not the Regge calculus (and two related simplicial formulations) is a consistent approximation to General Relativity. Our criteria will be based on the behavior of residual errors in the discrete equations when evaluated on solutions of the Einstein equations. We will show that for generic simplicial lattices the residual errors cannot be used to distinguish metrics which are solutions of Einstein's equations from those that are not. We will conclude that either the Regge calculus is an inconsistent approximation to General Relativity or that it is incorrect to use residual errors in the discrete equations as a criteria to judge the discrete equations.
    0 references
    0 references
    Regge calculus
    0 references
    general relativity
    0 references
    Einstein equations
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references