Phase transitions in the evolution of partial orders (Q5937243): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2030969508 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Entropy and phase transitions in partially ordered sets / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Asymptotic enumeration on partially ordered sets / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Number of Finite Topologies / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Asymptotic Enumeration of Partial Orders on a Finite Set / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Counting Partial Orders with a Fixed Number of Comparable Pairs / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 18:15, 3 June 2024

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1618724
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Phase transitions in the evolution of partial orders
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 1618724

    Statements

    Phase transitions in the evolution of partial orders (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    2 June 2002
    0 references
    Given \(P_n\), the class of all labeled posets on \([n]= \{1,\dots, n\}\), to provide a ``count'' can mean giving an estimate up to some degree of accuracy, such as the original celebrated Kleitman-Rothschild estimate \(\log_2|P_n|= {1\over 2} n^2+ O(n^{3/2}\log_2 n)\) and improvements by themselves and others. Given a partial order \(P\), the number of comparable pairs (typically roughly \((3/16)n^2\)) is taken as a (time) parameter whose ``cohort'' (at the same value of both order and that parameter) should show sufficient similarity of structure to permit, if not an exact count, then at least a Kleitman-Rothschild type estimate for that cohort, especially when \(n\) becomes large, for asymptotic results. If \(0< d< 1/2\), and the (time) parameter is \([dn^2]\) (the nearest integer to \(dn^2\)), if \(P_{n,d}\) denotes this cohort, then \(c(d)= \lim_{n\to\infty}\log_2|P_{n,d}|/n^2\) (provided this limit exists) is an example of such an asymptotic description of the behavior of ``cohorts''. The function \(c(d)\) can be interpreted as a type of entropy function, with \(0< d\leq 1/8\) yielding \(c(d)= {1\over 4} H(4d)\), \(H(x)= -x\log_2x-(1- x)\log_2(1- x)\) illustrating this interpretation according to Kleitman-Rothschild. The description and determination of \(c(d)\) for \(0< d<{1\over 2}\) is the main purpose of this very substantial paper, replete with a variety of very elegant results and proof techniques reminding readers of notions derived from analytic number theory, statistical mechanics, thermodynamics and also random graph theory become poset theory. Even optimization theory is packaged in the description, as in the notion of ``feasibility'', and certain computations are deemed ``technical'' more so than others. This large opus should do honor to Kleitman-Rothschild, Dhar and others concerned with counting finite posets in ``an earlier age'' as well as to encourage others to carry these investigations even further.
    0 references
    random posets
    0 references
    finite posets
    0 references
    comparability
    0 references
    asymptotic estimates
    0 references
    entropy
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references