Uniqueness of monogeny classes for uniform objects in abelian categories (Q1612144): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Weak Krull-Schmidt for infinite direct sums of uniserial modules / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Krull-Schmidt fails for serial modules / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Module theory. Endomorphism rings and direct sum decompositions in some classes of modules / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Krull-Schmidt Fails for Artinian Modules / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On Direct Decomposition of Torsion Free Abelian Groups. / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5639839 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3215398 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5517721 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Quasi-isomorphisms of finitely generated modules over valuation domains / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 15:15, 4 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Uniqueness of monogeny classes for uniform objects in abelian categories
scientific article

    Statements

    Uniqueness of monogeny classes for uniform objects in abelian categories (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    22 August 2002
    0 references
    The main result of the paper under review is a uniqueness theorem for the monogeny class of a finite coproduct \(A=A_1\oplus \cdots \oplus A_n\) of uniform objects of an abelian category \({\mathcal C}\). More precisely, given another finite coproduct \(B=B_1\oplus\cdots\oplus B_m\) of uniform objects in \({\mathcal C}\) admitting monomorphisms \(A\to B\) and \(B\to A\), it is shown that \(n=m\) and there are monomorphisms \(A_i\to B_{\sigma(i)}\) and \(B_{\sigma(i)}\to A_i\) for each \(i\) and some permutation \(\sigma\). The authors give an elementary proof on slightly more than two pages. Alternatively, one might view the result as a consequence of the classical Krull-Remak-Schmidt theorem. To see this, observe that one can assume \({\mathcal C}\) to be a small category. Embed \({\mathcal C}\) into the abelian Grothendieck category of left exact functors \({\mathcal C}^{op}\to {\mathcal A}b\) where \({\mathcal A}b\) denotes the category of abelian groups. The embedding is exact and sends uniform objects to uniform objects. Passing to the injective envelopes of \(A\) and \(B\), the classical Krull-Remak-Schmidt theorem can be applied.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    monogeny class
    0 references
    Krull-Remak-Schmidt theorem
    0 references
    uniform objects
    0 references