The consensus operator for combining beliefs. (Q1852852): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Belief functions and default reasoning / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3996777 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Supremum preserving upper probabilities / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Two views of belief: Belief as generalized probability and belief as evidence / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A LOGIC FOR UNCERTAIN PROBABILITIES / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4131415 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4236389 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The transferable belief model / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the Dempster-Shafer framework and new combination rules / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 11:19, 5 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The consensus operator for combining beliefs.
scientific article

    Statements

    The consensus operator for combining beliefs. (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    21 January 2003
    0 references
    The consensus operator provides a method for combining possibly conflicting beliefs within the Dempster-Shafer belief theory, and represents an alternative to the traditional Dempster's rule. This paper describes how the consensus operator can be applied to dogmatic conflicting opinions, i.e., when the degree of conflict is very high. It overcomes shortcomings of Dempster's rule and other operators that have been proposed for combining possibly conflicting beliefs.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    Dempster's rule
    0 references
    Belief
    0 references
    Conflict
    0 references
    Consensus operator
    0 references
    Subjective logic
    0 references