Duality for Bregman projections onto translated cones and affine subspaces. (Q1874472): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4347616 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q2768007 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4801817 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Convex analysis and nonlinear optimization. Theory and examples / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5580053 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Totally convex functions for fixed points computation and infinite dimensional optimization / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An iterative row-action method for interval convex programming / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4718793 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Logistic regression, AdaBoost and Bregman distances / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Best approximation in inner product spaces / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5638112 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 16:55, 5 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Duality for Bregman projections onto translated cones and affine subspaces.
scientific article

    Statements

    Duality for Bregman projections onto translated cones and affine subspaces. (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    25 May 2003
    0 references
    The author proves differently the dual characterization of Bregman projection onto linear constraints presented by \textit{S. Della Peitra}, \textit{V. Della Pietra} and \textit{J. Lafferty} [Duality and auxiliary functions for Bregman distances, Technical Report CMU-CS-01-109, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University (2002)] using the framework of convex analysis. Assuming a standard constraint qualification, the given proof is much shorter and cleaner and reveals the strange nonconvex component as a reformulation of a convex optimization problem.
    0 references
    0 references
    Affine subspace
    0 references
    Bregman distance
    0 references
    Bregman projection
    0 references
    Convex cone
    0 references
    Convex duality
    0 references
    Legendre function
    0 references
    Orthogonal complement
    0 references
    0 references