Smash product of pointed objects in lextensive categories (Q1413885): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Modularity and descent / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Introduction to extensive and distributive categories / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q5586461 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q5639839 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 11:36, 6 June 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Smash product of pointed objects in lextensive categories |
scientific article |
Statements
Smash product of pointed objects in lextensive categories (English)
0 references
17 November 2003
0 references
This paper proposes a categorical generalization of the (topological) concept of smash product. For a category \({\mathcal X}\) with finite limits and (enough) colimits, one can define the smash product \((X,p)\wedge(Y,q)\) of the objects \((X,p)\) and \((Y,q)\) of the pointed category (1\(\downarrow{\mathcal X})\) as the cokernel of the canonical morphism from \((X,p)+(Y,q)\) to \((X,p)\times(Y,q)\). The authors show that if the finite coproducts (in \({\mathcal X}\)) are pullback stable and all functors A\(\times(-)\colon{\mathcal X}\to{\mathcal X}\) (A\(\in{\mathcal X}\)) preserve certain types of pushouts, then this definition determines a canonical (symmetric and distributive with respect to coproducts) structure on (1\(\downarrow{\mathcal X}\)). If, in addition, \({\mathcal X}\) is lextensive, then it can be recovered from this structure (as the category of objects with counit in (1\(\downarrow{\mathcal X}\))). All these conditions are satisfied, in particular, in lextensive cartesian closed categories with finite colimits, the category of groupoids, and all pretoposes. Several examples are considered in order to evaluate the necessity of the various conditions.
0 references
smash product
0 references
monoidal categories
0 references
pointed categories
0 references
objects with counit
0 references