Weakly hyperbolic systems with Hölder continuous coefficients (Q1878498): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3921589 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4513485 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3207471 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3331627 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4386481 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Regularly hyperbolic systems and Gevrey classes / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Cauchy problem for nonstrictly hyperbolic systems in Gevrey classes / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3805161 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3320763 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3816432 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 20:22, 6 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Weakly hyperbolic systems with Hölder continuous coefficients
scientific article

    Statements

    Weakly hyperbolic systems with Hölder continuous coefficients (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    20 August 2004
    0 references
    The authors consider the Cauchy problem for the system \[ \partial_t U= A(t)\partial_x U+ B(t)U,\quad t\in [0,T],\quad x\in\mathbb{R},\tag{1} \] \[ U(0,x)= U_0(x),\quad x\in\mathbb{R},\tag{2} \] where \(U\in\mathbb{C}^3\), \(A(t)\) is an \(m\times m\) matrix with real eigenvalues. Assume that \(A(t)\) is in \(C^{0,\alpha}([0, T])\) and \(B(t)\) in \(C^0([0, T])\). Then the authors proved that if \(m= 2,3\), the Cauchy problem (1)--(2) is well posed in the Gevrey class of index \(s\) for \(1< s< 1+{\alpha\over m}\). Moreover, they proved that if \(A(t)^2\) is Hermitian, the Cauchy, problem (1)--(2) is well posed in the Gevrey class of index \(s\) for \(1< s< 1+{\alpha\over 2}\), and besides if \(\text{det\,}A(t)\) is not zero for all \(t\), then (1)--(2) is well posed in Gevrey class of index \(s\) for \(1< s< {1\over 1-\alpha}\). The proof of theorems was done by use of quasi symmetrizers.
    0 references
    0 references
    Gevrey class
    0 references
    Gevrey well-posedness
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references