Hook immanantal inequalities for trees explained (Q1381277): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
Created claim: Wikidata QID (P12): Q126351602, #quickstatements; #temporary_batch_1718107978296
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Immanant Inequalities for Laplacians of Trees / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Hook immanantal inequalities for Laplacians of trees / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4002278 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3669422 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Immanants of combinatorial matrices / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Immant dominance orderings for hook partitions / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Laplacian permanental polynomial for trees / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Laplacian matrices of graphs: A survey / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5339348 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4001520 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / Wikidata QID
 
Property / Wikidata QID: Q126351602 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 13:14, 11 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Hook immanantal inequalities for trees explained
scientific article

    Statements

    Hook immanantal inequalities for trees explained (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    31 August 1998
    0 references
    Let \(\overline d_k\) denote the normalized hook immanant corresponding to the partition \((k, 1^{n-k})\) of \(n.\) It was proved by \textit{P. Heyfron} [Linear Multilinear Algebra 24, No. 1, 65-78 (1988; Zbl 0678.15009)] that the family of immanantal inequalities \[ \det A = \overline d_1(A) \leq \overline d_2(A) \leq \cdots \leq \overline d_n(A)= \text{per }A \] holds for all positive semidefinite Hermitian matrices \(A.\) The authors improve the above bound to \[ \overline{d}_{k-1}(L(T)) \leq \frac{k-2}{k-1} \overline{d}_k (L(T)) \] for \(2 \leq k \leq n\) whenever \(L(T)\) is the Laplacian matrix of a tree \(T.\) Heyfron's proof technique for the above result relied too much on recursive relations and it didn't give any insight into the correctness of the result. In this paper, the authors give an easy and elegant proof using the notion of vertex orientations. This also helps them to obtain an improved bound \[ 0 \leq \frac{1}{k-1} [ \overline{d}_k(L(T)) - \overline{d}_k(L(S(n))) ] \leq \frac{k-2}{k-1} \overline{d}_k (L(T)) - \overline{d}_{k-1} (L(T)) \] where \(S(n)\) is the star on \(n\) vertices.
    0 references
    positive semidefinite Hermitian matrix
    0 references
    hook partition
    0 references
    hook immanant
    0 references
    vertex orientation
    0 references
    Laplacian matrix of a tree
    0 references
    immanantal inequalities
    0 references

    Identifiers