A combinatorial problem in finite fields. I (Q1243308): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Cyclotomic Numbers of Order Eighteen with Applications to Difference Sets / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Cyclotomy, Higher Congruences, and Waring's Problem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3251484 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The cyclotomic numbers of order fourteen / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The cyclotomic numbers of order twenty / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5606712 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5538955 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Cyclotomic Numbers of Order Sixteen / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3274226 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The cyclotomic numbers of order twelve / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A COMBINATORIAL PROBLEM IN FINITE FIELDS, II / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 22:44, 12 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A combinatorial problem in finite fields. I
scientific article

    Statements

    A combinatorial problem in finite fields. I (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1979
    0 references
    Given a subgroup \(G\) of the multiplicative group of a finite field, we investigate the number of representations of an arbitrary field element as a sum of elements, one from each coset of \(G\). When \(G\) is of small index, the theory of cyclotomy yields exact results. For all other \(G\), we obtain good estimates. Let \(p=2n+1\) be an odd prime. Consider the \(2n\) sums represented by the expression \(\pm 1 \pm 2 \pm 3 \pm \dots \pm n.\) How do these sums distribute themselves among the residue classes modulo \(p\)? The answer is, as uniformly as possible; in fact, if we define \(N(a)\) as the number of ways of choosing the signs so that \(\pm 1 \pm 2 \pm 3 \pm \dots \pm n \equiv a \pmod p\) then we have Theorem 1. \[ N(a) = \frac 1p (2^n - (2/p))\quad \text{for}\quad a\not\equiv 0 \pmod p , \] \[ N(0) = \frac 1p (2^n - (2/p))+(2/p). \] Here \((2/p)\) is the Legendre symbol. This paper formed a portion of the author's doctoral dissertation.
    0 references
    finite fields
    0 references
    cyclotomy
    0 references
    multiplicative group
    0 references

    Identifiers

    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references