A note on matrix inversion (Q789471): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-3795(84)90177-0 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2029723395 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Matrices and pairs of modules / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5668937 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5508993 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Smith form, the inversion rule for 2x2 matrices, and the uniqueness of the invariant factors for finitely generated modules / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 10:59, 14 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A note on matrix inversion
scientific article

    Statements

    A note on matrix inversion (English)
    0 references
    1984
    0 references
    This paper shows that if M, N, U, V are left modules over a ring R and \(\partial:M+N\to U+V\) is an isomorphism given in matrix form as \(\left[ \begin{matrix} A&B \\ C&D \end{matrix} \right]\) then if \(\partial^{-1}\) has the matrix form \(\left[ \begin{matrix} X&Y \\ Z&W\end{matrix} \right]\) it follows that A and W have isomorphic cokernels and kernels. Analogous statements hold for D and X, B and Y, Z and C. This generalizes an earlier result of \textit{R. C. Thompson} [ibid. 44, 197-201 (1982; Zbl 0483.15011)] for matrices over a principal ideal domain. In that paper the condition on kernels and cokernels was replaced by the equivalent statement that the pair of matrices had the same Smith canonical form.
    0 references
    matrix inversion, principal ideal domain
    0 references
    Smith canonical form
    0 references

    Identifiers