On the Eneström-Kakeya theorem (Q5896443): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9045(84)90041-8 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W4210363557 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Zeros of polynomials and fractional differences of their coefficients / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the Eneström-Kakeya theorem / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the derivative of a polynomial / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the Location of Zeros of Polynomials / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On Kakeya's Theorem / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 13:59, 14 June 2024

scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3871975
Language Label Description Also known as
English
On the Eneström-Kakeya theorem
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3871975

    Statements

    On the Eneström-Kakeya theorem (English)
    0 references
    1984
    0 references
    As an extension of a classical result of Eneström and Kakeya (if \(a_ n\geq a_{n-1}\geq a_{n-2}\geq...\geq a_ 1>0\), then for \(| z| >1\), \(\sum^{n}_{k=0}a_ kz^ k\neq 0)\), it was proved by Joyal, Labelle and Rahman that if \(p(z)=\sum^{n}_{k=0}a_ kz^ k\) is a polynomial of (exact) degree n (\(n\geq 1)\) such that (1) \(a_ n\geq a_{n-1}\geq a_{n-2}\geq...\geq a_ 1\geq a_ 0\), then p(z) has all its zeros in the disc (2) \(| z|\leq (a_ n-a_ 0+| a_ 0|)/| a_ n|.\) In this paper the authors show that the disc given by (2) can be replaced by an annulus with a smaller outer radius. They also show that the results obtained by their theorem are always at least as good as those obtained by (2) and give some examples to illustrate that in some cases the results obtained by their theorem are very much better than those obtained by (2).
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references