On the Eneström-Kakeya theorem (Q5896443): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Set profile property. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / full work available at URL | |||
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9045(84)90041-8 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID | |||
Property / OpenAlex ID: W4210363557 / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Zeros of polynomials and fractional differences of their coefficients / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: On the Eneström-Kakeya theorem / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: On the derivative of a polynomial / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: On the Location of Zeros of Polynomials / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: On Kakeya's Theorem / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 13:59, 14 June 2024
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3871975
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | On the Eneström-Kakeya theorem |
scientific article; zbMATH DE number 3871975 |
Statements
On the Eneström-Kakeya theorem (English)
0 references
1984
0 references
As an extension of a classical result of Eneström and Kakeya (if \(a_ n\geq a_{n-1}\geq a_{n-2}\geq...\geq a_ 1>0\), then for \(| z| >1\), \(\sum^{n}_{k=0}a_ kz^ k\neq 0)\), it was proved by Joyal, Labelle and Rahman that if \(p(z)=\sum^{n}_{k=0}a_ kz^ k\) is a polynomial of (exact) degree n (\(n\geq 1)\) such that (1) \(a_ n\geq a_{n-1}\geq a_{n-2}\geq...\geq a_ 1\geq a_ 0\), then p(z) has all its zeros in the disc (2) \(| z|\leq (a_ n-a_ 0+| a_ 0|)/| a_ n|.\) In this paper the authors show that the disc given by (2) can be replaced by an annulus with a smaller outer radius. They also show that the results obtained by their theorem are always at least as good as those obtained by (2) and give some examples to illustrate that in some cases the results obtained by their theorem are very much better than those obtained by (2).
0 references