Foundations of a functional approach to knowledge representation (Q799390): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0004-3702(84)90009-2 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2021693981 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4199578 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Circumscription - a form of non-monotonic reasoning / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Non-monotonic logic. I / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: A logic for default reasoning / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Some representational issues in default reasoning / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Interpreting network formalisms / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 15:46, 14 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Foundations of a functional approach to knowledge representation
scientific article

    Statements

    Foundations of a functional approach to knowledge representation (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1984
    0 references
    We present a new approach to knowledge representation where knowledge bases are characterized not in terms of the structures they use to represent knowledge, but functionally, in terms of what they can be asked or told about some domain. Starting with a representation system that can be asked questions and told facts in a full first-order logical language, we then define ask- and tell-operations over an extended language that can refer not only to the domain but to what the knowledge base knows about that domain. The major technical result is that the resulting knowledge, which now includes auto-epistemic aspects, can still be represented symbolically in first-order terms. We also consider extensions to the framework such as defaults and definitional facilities. The overall result is a formal foundation for knowledge representation which, in accordance with current principles of software design, cleanly separates functionality from implementation structure.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    knowledge representation
    0 references
    knowledge bases
    0 references
    functionality
    0 references
    0 references