Multiobjective Q-analysis with concordance and discordance concepts (Q1061607): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claim: author (P16): Item:Q595508
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: Lucien Duckstein / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0096-3003(85)90021-9 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2027312016 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3221775 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Multiple attribute decision making. Methods and applications. A state-of- the-art survey / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3252269 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Outline of a New Approach to the Analysis of Complex Systems and Decision Processes / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 17:32, 14 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Multiobjective Q-analysis with concordance and discordance concepts
scientific article

    Statements

    Multiobjective Q-analysis with concordance and discordance concepts (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1985
    0 references
    A multicriterion decision-making (MCDM) technique with possibly nonnumerical criteria, called Multicriteria Q-Analysis I (MCQA-I), developed earlier on the basis of only a concordance analysis, is extended to include a measure of discordance. This new version, labeled MCQA-II, reduces an MCDM problem to the tradeoff between three conflicting indices calculated for each project or alternative. These indices are respectively a value or utility-type index ''psi'', and two outranking indices ''pdi'' and ''pci''. The example of selecting a project to alleviate pollution problems in the lower San Francisco Bay area illustrates the application of both versions of MCQA. A sensitivity analysis performed on the slicing-level set tends to show that MCQA-II leads to a more stable ranking than MCQA-I; in either case, application of the technique leads to selection of the project preferred in practice.
    0 references
    multicriterion decision-making
    0 references
    Multicriteria Q-Analysis I
    0 references
    MCQA-II
    0 references
    sensitivity analysis
    0 references
    ranking
    0 references

    Identifiers