Bounded-depth, polynomial-size circuits for symmetric functions (Q1063574): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Importer (talk | contribs)
Created a new Item
 
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: Larry J. Stockmeyer / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Leon Livovschi / rank
Normal rank
 
Property / author
 
Property / author: Larry J. Stockmeyer / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / reviewed by
 
Property / reviewed by: Leon Livovschi / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3975(85)90045-3 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2063584607 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: \(\Sigma_ 1^ 1\)-formulae on finite structures / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Constant Depth Reducibility / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5606602 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3290963 / rank
 
Normal rank
links / mardi / namelinks / mardi / name
 

Latest revision as of 19:00, 14 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Bounded-depth, polynomial-size circuits for symmetric functions
scientific article

    Statements

    Bounded-depth, polynomial-size circuits for symmetric functions (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1985
    0 references
    Let \(\{f_ 1,f_ 2,...\}\) be a family of symmetric Boolean functions, where \(f_ n\) has n variables. For this family the minimum number of variables of \(f_ n\) is considered that have to be set to constant values so that the resulting function is a constant function. It is shown that the growth rate of this minimum completely determines whether or not the given family if ''good'', that is, can be realized by a family of constant-depth, polynomial-size circuits (with unbounded fan-in), and explicit growth rates, which define good respectively bad families, are given. The authors' results provide a unifying framework to show why the families of parity and majority functions are bad. (From the text).
    0 references
    spectrum
    0 references
    measure function
    0 references
    parity functions
    0 references
    symmetric Boolean functions
    0 references
    growth rate
    0 references
    majority functions
    0 references

    Identifiers