Some properties of \(\kappa\)-complete ideals defined in terms of infinite games (Q1068819): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-0072(84)90039-3 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2030937275 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On splitting stationary subsets of large cardinals / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Inequalities for cardinal powers / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: An ideal game / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Precipitous ideals / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On ideals of sets and the power set operation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Ideals over uncountable sets: application of almost disjoint functions and generic ultrapowers / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Some applications of iterated ultrapowers in set theory / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Chang's conjecture and powers of singular cardinals / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Some examples of precipitous ideals / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 10:04, 17 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Some properties of \(\kappa\)-complete ideals defined in terms of infinite games
scientific article

    Statements

    Some properties of \(\kappa\)-complete ideals defined in terms of infinite games (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1984
    0 references
    Let I be a non-trivial \(\kappa\)-complete ideal over the regular uncountable cardinal \(\kappa\). The paper starts from the following infinite game between two players, One and Two. The players take turns choosing subsets of \(\kappa\) not in I. Player One starts by choosing \(A_ 0\), then Two chooses \(B_ 0\subseteq A_ 0\), then One chooses \(A_ 1\subseteq B_ 0\), and so on. Player One wins if and only if \(\{A_ n\); \(n=0,1,2,..\}\) is empty. It is well known that the ideal is precipitous if and only if Player One does not have a winning strategy in this game. In Section 1, this game is modified to obtain two related games which are determined, and for both of which the ideal I is precipitous if and only if Player Two has a winning strategy in this game. Some remarks are made about the Galvin-Hajnal norm of an ordinal function and normed ideals. This work is continued by \textit{T. J. Jech} and \textit{W. J. Mitchell} in Ann. Pure Appl. Logic 24, 131-151 (1983; Zbl 0524.03038). In Sections 2 and 3, related games are considered, which the author uses to define the notions of weakly precipitous and pseudo-precipitous ideal.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    regular uncountable cardinal
    0 references
    Galvin-Hajnal norm of an ordinal function
    0 references
    normed ideals
    0 references
    precipitous ideal
    0 references
    0 references