Central limit theorem for weakly lacunary Walsh series (Q1078461): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Changed an Item |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Central limit theorem for the Walsh system / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: On Lacunary trigonometric series / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: On Lacunary trigonometric series, II / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q4746556 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Revision as of 15:01, 17 June 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | Central limit theorem for weakly lacunary Walsh series |
scientific article |
Statements
Central limit theorem for weakly lacunary Walsh series (English)
0 references
1985
0 references
Let \(x\in [0,1]\), \(r_ k(x)=sgn(\sin 2^ k\pi x)\), k-1,2,..., be the Rademacher functions. For each natural number n, \(n=\sum_{k}\epsilon_ k2^ k\) \((\epsilon_ k=0\) or \(\epsilon_ k=1)\), set \(\omega_ n(x)=\prod_{k}\{r_{k+1}(x)\}^{\epsilon_ k}.\) Moreover, let \(\omega_ 0(x)\equiv 1\). Then \(\{\omega_ n(x)\}\) is a Walsh system in Paley's ordering. In 1975 A. Földes proved the following central limit theorem: Theorem A. Let us be given a sequence of natural numbers \(\{n_ k\}\) and a sequence of non-negative numbers \(\{a_ k\}\), satisfying the conditions (1.1) \(n_{k+1}>n_ k(1+c\cdot k^{-\alpha})\), \(k=1,2,...\), (1.2) \(A^ 2_ N=\sum^{N}_{k=1}a^ 2_ k\to \infty\) as \(N\to \infty\), (1.3) \(a_ N=O(A_ N\cdot N^{-\alpha})\) as \(N\to \infty\), where c and \(\alpha\) are constants such that \(c>0\) and \(0\leq \alpha \leq\). Then for all t \[ (1.4)\quad \lim_{m\to \infty}| \{x:\quad x\in [0,1],\quad \sum^{N}_{k=1}a_ k\omega_{n_ k}(x)\leq t\cdot A_ N\}| =\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}\int^{t}\quad_{-\infty}\exp (- \frac{z^ 2}{2})dz, \] where the sign \(| \cdot |\) denotes the Lebesgue measure of a set. The aim of the present paper is to prove that estimate (1.3) is the best possible. More precisely the author proves that: Theorem B. For any fixed constants c and \(\alpha\) such that \(c>0\) and \(0\leq \alpha \leq\), there exists sequences \(\{n_ k\}\) and \(\{a_ k\}\), satisfying conditions (1.1), (1.2) and \((1.5)\quad a_ N=O(A_ N\cdot N^{-\alpha})\) as \(N\to \infty\), such that relation (1.4) is not satisfied.
0 references
Rademacher functions
0 references
Walsh system
0 references
Paley's ordering
0 references