A numerical comparison of one-dimensional fluid jet models applied to drop-on-demand printing (Q1081451): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
RedirectionBot (talk | contribs)
Removed claims
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Property / author
 
Property / author: Thomas W. Shield / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / author
 
Property / author: David B. Bogy / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9991(86)90266-4 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2037755746 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Breakup of a liquid jet: Third perturbation Cosserat solution / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: On the non-linear behaviour of fluid jets / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Finite difference solution of the Cosserat fluid jet equations / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4171531 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 15:11, 17 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A numerical comparison of one-dimensional fluid jet models applied to drop-on-demand printing
scientific article

    Statements

    A numerical comparison of one-dimensional fluid jet models applied to drop-on-demand printing (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1986
    0 references
    This paper presents a numerical simulation of capillary jets motivated by the study of drop-on-demand ink-jet printing. Two sets of 1-dimensional equations for an inviscid axisymmetric fluid jet are integrated using a numerical scheme suggested by MacCormack's predictor corrector algorithm. The difference between the two sets of equations is the inclusion or exclusion of the terms that account for radial inertia. When these terms are included the numerical scheme necessary to solve the equations is more complicated. The results from both schemes are presented for three Weber numbers with a simplified nozzle entry pressure history that has been converted to a velocity history at the nozzle exit by a momentum integral applied to the nozzle region. The results indicate that at higher Weber numbers the omission of radial inertia has a greater effect on the drop profiles than at lower Weber numbers. The conditions under which each numerical scheme might be a useful simulation are also discussed.
    0 references
    numerical simulation
    0 references
    capillary jets
    0 references
    drop-on-demand ink-jet printing
    0 references
    inviscid axisymmetric fluid jet
    0 references
    MacCormack's predictor corrector algorithm
    0 references
    radial inertia
    0 references
    momentum integral
    0 references

    Identifiers