Three dimensional nonlinear MHD calculations using implicit and explicit time integration schemes (Q1086103): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Correction to: ``3D nonlinear calculations of resistive tearing modes'' / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The effect of diamagnetic rotation on the nonlinear coupling of tearing modes / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Stabilization of the tearing mode in high-temperature plasma / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Theory of resistivity-gradient-driven turbulence / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Theory of anomalous tearing mode growth and the major tokamak disruption / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Nonlinear drift tearing modes / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Nonlinear interaction of tearing modes in highly resistive tokamaks / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Rippling modes in the edge of a tokamak plasma / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Numerical calculations using the full MHD equations in toroidal geometry / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Coherent nonlinear destabilization of tearing modes / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 18:09, 17 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Three dimensional nonlinear MHD calculations using implicit and explicit time integration schemes
scientific article

    Statements

    Three dimensional nonlinear MHD calculations using implicit and explicit time integration schemes (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1986
    0 references
    The authors introduce two schemes for the time integration of the nonlinear three-dimensional MHD equations which include diamagnetic and thermal force effects. They call them mostly-explicit (m.e.) and mostly- implicit (m.i.) scheme, respectively. The m.e. is second order accurate in time and explicit for convective and perpendicular diffusive terms, while the m.i. is first order accurate in time and implicit for linear but explicit for nonlinear terms. Both use Fourier representation in angular variables and finite difference in radial coordinate. The comparison of the schemes shows that the relative efficiency depends on the problem studied and on the relative dominance of nonlinear terms. So e.g. for nonlinear interaction of tearing modes the m.e., while for the nonlinear evolution of rippling modes the m.i. is more efficient. As the convergence studies show, the different attitude of the schemes is due to the basic difference in the dynamics of the problem and not to the numerical implementation.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    mostly-implicit scheme
    0 references
    mostly-explicit scheme
    0 references
    time integration
    0 references
    nonlinear three-dimensional MHD equations
    0 references
    thermal force effects
    0 references
    diffusive terms
    0 references
    first order accurate
    0 references
    Fourier representation
    0 references
    finite difference
    0 references
    nonlinear interaction
    0 references
    tearing modes
    0 references
    nonlinear evolution
    0 references
    rippling modes
    0 references
    convergence
    0 references
    numerical implementation
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references