Some combinatorial properties of discriminants in metric vector spaces (Q1086575): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-8708(86)90104-0 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2086362351 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5610277 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Bimatroids and invariants / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4166767 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5630276 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4111952 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5684698 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 17:11, 17 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Some combinatorial properties of discriminants in metric vector spaces
scientific article

    Statements

    Some combinatorial properties of discriminants in metric vector spaces (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1986
    0 references
    If V is a metric vector space with bilinear form \({\mathcal B}\), and F is a finite set of vectors in V, the discriminant of \({\mathcal B}\) with respect to F is given by \(d_{{\mathcal B}}(F):=\det (({\mathcal B}(f,g))_{f,g\in F})\). If \({\mathcal B}\) is anisotropic on V and E is a finite subset of V, the set system \({\mathcal I}:=\{F\subseteq E| d_{{\mathcal B}}(F)\neq 0\}\) is clearly a matroid. In an arbitrary metric vector space, \({\mathcal I}\) may fail to be closed with respect to subsets. Nevertheless, these set systems retain many interesting properties, in particular: (i) if all subsets of E of cardinality n and \(n+1\) are not in \({\mathcal I}\), then no subset of cardinality exceeding \(n+1\) is in \({\mathcal I}\); (ii) if F and G are in \({\mathcal I}\) and the cardinality of F is less than that of G, F may be augmented to a set F' in \({\mathcal I}\) by the addition of at most elements from G; (iii) all maximal subsets in \({\mathcal I}\) have the same cardinality, and form the bases of a linearly representable matroid; (iv) if \(G\subseteq F\subseteq E\) and if F is contained in the linear span of G, then there exists some \(I\subseteq G\) with \(I\in {\mathcal I}\) such that the cardinality of I is {\#}I\(=\max \{\#I'| I'\subseteq F\) and I'\(\in {\mathcal I}\}.\) In this paper, we introduce a set of axioms for a new class of set systems called metroids, and show that these axioms assure that these and other essential properties of the set systems associated with metric vector spaces hold in metroids generally. It is further shown that another recent generalization of matroids known as bimatroids are a special class of metroids, although the converse is not true.
    0 references
    metric vector
    0 references
    discriminant
    0 references
    matroid
    0 references
    set systems
    0 references
    metroids
    0 references
    bimatroids
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers