Proportional allocation schemes for tour costs (Q1820664): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Set OpenAlex properties.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Values of Non-Atomic Games / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Allocation of Shared Costs: A Set of Axioms Yielding A Unique Procedure / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Internal Telephone Billing Rates—A Novel Application of Non-Atomic Game Theory / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Fixed-Route Cost Allocation / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Proportional Solutions to Bargaining Situations: Interpersonal Utility Comparisons / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Common Costs, Fixed Charges, Clubs and Games / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Demand Compatible Equitable Cost Sharing Prices / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5817870 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Existence of a Core When There Are Increasing Returns / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Incentives, Decentralized Control, the Assignment of Joint Costs and Internal Pricing / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 19:07, 17 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Proportional allocation schemes for tour costs
scientific article

    Statements

    Proportional allocation schemes for tour costs (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    1987
    0 references
    This paper examines the problem of allocating intercity travel costs for a multicity trip to sponsors at the different cities in as fair a manner as possible when each sponsor is willing to pay as much as the round-trip cost between his city and the traveler's home. Intercity travel costs are presumed to satisfy the usual triangle inequality. The paper first considers a fixed-route situation and shows that four axioms - including full cost recovery, monotonicity and additivity conditions - delineate a simple class of allocation schemes. All possible tours through the cities are then admitted under a fifth axiom which says that minimum-cost tours are Pareto optimal for the sponsors. This efficiency axiom further restricts the class of allocation schemes, but it does not force a unique result. Additional conditions that do in fact identify a unique scheme are mentioned. A relaxation of the triangle inequality for costs is also discussed.
    0 references
    0 references
    allocating intercity travel costs
    0 references
    0 references