A train algebra that is not special triangular (Q1821189): Difference between revisions
From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item. |
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs) Changed an Item |
||
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type | |||
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: A note on train algebras / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: XXIII.—Genetic Algebras / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Special Train Algebras Arising in Genetics / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Contributions to genetic algebras / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Free non-associative principal train algebras / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Structure of Genetic Algebras / rank | |||
Normal rank | |||
Property / cites work | |||
Property / cites work: Q3869125 / rank | |||
Normal rank |
Latest revision as of 19:22, 17 June 2024
scientific article
Language | Label | Description | Also known as |
---|---|---|---|
English | A train algebra that is not special triangular |
scientific article |
Statements
A train algebra that is not special triangular (English)
0 references
1988
0 references
Two important classes of nonassociative algebras arising in population genetics are the train algebras and the special triangular (or Gonshor) algebras. Every special triangular algebra is train. The question of whether there exist commutative train algebras (over a field of characterization 0) that are not special triangular was open for 40 years before V. M. Abraham constructed a 6 dimensional example with 3 generators. He also showed that every train algebra of dimension \(\leq 4\) is special triangular. I showed later that every train algebra with a single generator is special triangular. The example of the present paper fills two gaps in that it is of dimension 5 and has 2 generators. Abraham's example worked because it contains an ideal of codimension 1 which is nil but not nilopotent. The present case also shows that that property is not a necessary feature of a train, but non special triangular, algebra.
0 references
population genetics
0 references
special triangular algebra
0 references
commutative train algebras
0 references
Gonshor algebra
0 references