Solution of Ulam's problem on searching with a lie (Q1090471): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0097-3165(87)90065-3 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2058515835 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5568914 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Coping with known patterns of lies in a search game / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Coping with errors in binary search procedures / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Guess a Number-with Lying / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q4121861 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 20:15, 17 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
Solution of Ulam's problem on searching with a lie
scientific article

    Statements

    Solution of Ulam's problem on searching with a lie (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1987
    0 references
    \textit{S. M. Ulam} [''Adventures of a mathematician'' (1976; Zbl 0352.01009)] stated the following problem: what is the minimal number of yes-no queries needed to find an integer between one and one million, if one lie is allowed among the answers. \textit{R. L. Rivest}, \textit{A. R. Meyer}, \textit{D. J. Kleitman}, \textit{K. Winkelmann} and \textit{J. Spencer} [J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 20, 396-404 (1980; Zbl 0443.68043)] and \textit{J. Spencer} [Math. Mag. 57, 105-108 (1984; Zbl 0538.90110)] gave partial solutions by establishing bounds for the minimal number of queries necessary to find a number in the set \(\{\) 1,...,n\(\}\). Applied to the original question both solutions yield two possibilities: 25 or 26. We give an exact solution of Ulam's problem in the general case. For \(n=10^ 6\) the answer turns out to be 25. We also give an algorithm to perform the search using the minimal number of queries.
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    searching
    0 references
    minimal number of yes-no queries
    0 references
    0 references