The place of the \(L_ 1\)-norm in robust estimation (Q1091694): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Import240304020342 (talk | contribs)
Set profile property.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Property / full work available at URL
 
Property / full work available at URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9473(87)90049-1 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W1562577836 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3321260 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3673862 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3723487 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5613647 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Robust regression: Asymptotics, conjectures and Monte Carlo / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Robust Statistics / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Minimax Aspects of Bounded-Influence Regression / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Least Median of Squares Regression / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Robust regression using repeated medians / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 09:47, 18 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
The place of the \(L_ 1\)-norm in robust estimation
scientific article

    Statements

    The place of the \(L_ 1\)-norm in robust estimation (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1987
    0 references
    In robust estimation, \(L_ 1\)-methods serve two main purposes: They provide estimates with minimal bias if the observations are asymmetrically contaminated, and they furnish convenient starting values for estimates based on iterative procedures. In general, such \(L_ 1\)- estimates are weighted ones, but there are problems with the choice of weights. It is pointed out that the two most popular choices of weights are non- robust: with constant weights, the estimates are sensitive to outliers at influential points, and with Hampel-Krasker-Welsch-type weights they are sensitive to local shifts. Other M-estimates of regression suffer from the same problem. Some recommendations for qualitative improvement are given.
    0 references
    regression diagnostics
    0 references
    breakdown point
    0 references
    sensitivity
    0 references
    generalization of sample median
    0 references
    \(L_ 1\)-estimation
    0 references
    minimax asymptotic bias
    0 references
    multiple regression
    0 references
    robust estimation
    0 references
    minimal bias
    0 references
    iterative procedures
    0 references
    choice of weights
    0 references
    constant weights
    0 references
    outliers
    0 references
    influential points
    0 references
    Hampel- Krasker-Welsch-type weights
    0 references
    local shifts
    0 references
    M-estimates
    0 references

    Identifiers