A note on chain-binomial models of epidemic spread: What is wrong with the Reed-Frost formulation? (Q1092836): Difference between revisions

From MaRDI portal
Added link to MaRDI item.
ReferenceBot (talk | contribs)
Changed an Item
 
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Property / MaRDI profile type
 
Property / MaRDI profile type: MaRDI publication profile / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / OpenAlex ID
 
Property / OpenAlex ID: W2067268186 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: The Epidemic Curve / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q3713901 / rank
 
Normal rank
Property / cites work
 
Property / cites work: Q5724331 / rank
 
Normal rank

Latest revision as of 11:45, 18 June 2024

scientific article
Language Label Description Also known as
English
A note on chain-binomial models of epidemic spread: What is wrong with the Reed-Frost formulation?
scientific article

    Statements

    A note on chain-binomial models of epidemic spread: What is wrong with the Reed-Frost formulation? (English)
    0 references
    0 references
    1987
    0 references
    Derivations of the Reed-Frost model are analyzed in terms of the assumptions about the probabilistic process used and in terms of internal consistency. Internally consistent derivations can be exhibited but require assumptions about the basic probabilistic process that are clearly unreasonable. A properly posed, more general model is derivable through the use of \textit{P. D. En'ko}'s model (1889) and the generating function for the number of contacts per person [see \textit{K. Dietz} and \textit{D. Schenzle}, A celebration of statistics, The ISI Centen. Vol. 167- 204 (1985; Zbl 0586.92017)].
    0 references
    chain-binomial models of epidemic spread
    0 references
    Reed-Frost model
    0 references
    internal consistency
    0 references
    generating function for the number of contacts per person
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references
    0 references

    Identifiers